Sofa, check.
Diet Coke, check.
Kids asleep, check.
Looks like I'm ready to watch a videotape of the FM candidates' forum I missed last Friday. Roll tape! By the way, I'll confess up front that my writing style here is deliberately loose -- blog style more than newspaper style. One more disclosure -- I logged all the questions and answers from the debate, but for space reasons, I edited out some of those Q's and A's that ultimately didn't make a difference in this discussion.
SCENE SETTER:
Candidates are seated on the right 2/3 of the council bench. The News Connection, sponsoring this event, gets good logo/product placement with a banner across the front of the council bench. Bob Weir, TNC editor, is standing at the podium to the right where people stand to address the council during meetings. The rules are simple. Each candidate gets opening and closing statements. In between Bob will read questions submitted in advance by the audience, and screened.
THE PRELUDE:
Bob Weir thanks Carol Kohankie for organizing the refreshments in the lobby. 10 points for Carol, who wins the prelude round.
THE OPENING:
Bob welcomes everyone to the forum, gives a plug to his paper. Thanks to Angie Cox for screening questions and Sylvia Imboden for serving as timekeeper.
OPENING STATEMENTS:
Jody welcomes first candidate, Jody Smith, for a 2-minute introduction. The Mayor mentions road projects, including 3040, that are completed or underway. Says that growing neighboring cities are what's adding to traffic woes. Notes that FM Town reserve fund is up to 20%, almost double what she inherited two years ago. Proud of the new hotel project coming to Flower Mound, businesses and retail in Lakeside. Slimmed and trimmed government. Says she's proud of new Town Manager Harlan Jefferson.
Jim Lang introduced. He says he's visiting the top 1,000 voting households in Flower Mound -- he's about halfway there. He too congratulates Harlan Jefferson. While Jody is not a loud speaker, Jim is even more quiet in his demeanor. Focuses on his personal background, says he'll save issues for the questions to follow.
Councilwoman Laurie Long announced, and applause. Says she's not here to promote herself, because she doesn't have to (a luxury of running unopposed), but says she's here to answer questions. She says to call or e-mail her, and she gives out her phone number.
Applause for Paul Stone. Paul says the computer ate his opening remarks, and says that's bad for us, because without something written, he'll ramble.
SCORING UPDATE: No points for the candidates so far. Carol Kohankie's refreshments still in the lead.
QUESTION/ANSWER TIME
QUESTION: To the Mayor, what has been your role in attracting quality commercial development for Flower Mound? Answer: Taking leadership. Says starting with the Stryker deal, leading the charge that Flower Mound is open for business.
QUESTION: To Jim Lang, in your past position, what has been your role in attracting quality commercial development? Answer: Working with commercial real estate community, marketing, advertising, incentive agreements etc. Keeping up with data from day to day. Says he's an ombudsman for facilitating development process.
QUESTION: To all candidates, "Do you have your candidate signs on any property that you have been told you may not put signs on, and if so, will you remove them?"
***** WHISTLE BLOWS: THE VIDEOTAPE REFEREE STOPS THE ACTION >>You gotta be kidding me. This is what people are really asking in a candidates' forum? We get 90 minutes this whole campaign to find out which candidate might be a better match for our vote, and this is what we're going to have to base our vote on?
***** DIATRIBE OVER. PLAY RESUMES.For some reason we start with Laurie Long, an uncontested candidate. (I think Bob's just trying to fair.) She says she's legal. Paul says he's legal. Same with the Mayor, who asks her supporters to let her know if they see a sign of her that doesn't have the "re-elect" sticker on it. So noted. Lang says he's legal, and adds a clarification about some disputed but otherwise insignificant sign near Salernos. I ask myself, how is this important in the big scheme of things?
QUESTION: For Paul Stone, state some of your history in the town, and are any of the membership fees of the organizations you belong to, paid for by the Town? (Another "huh?" question.) Paul can't fit all his past and current associations into the alloted time. Says he pays membership fees for everything he does.
Same question for Mayor Smith. Proudly served without pay on many organizations.
Mr. Lang. Rotary. Currently serves as VP-elect, working on sponsors for Cross Timbers Classic. Notes that he represented Town on Rotary. Served on Chamber Board of Directors. Law firms pays some dues. Plugs his church, Valley Creek.
Mrs. Long opens her time by saying that the Town paid for Mr. Lang's Rotary membership at one time. (Ahhh, so that's the reason for the question in the first place -- we're trying to stick it to someone.) Says she paid her own way at Rotary and Chamber. Many other organizations -- she pays her own dues.
SCORING UPDATE: Still no plus-points for any candidates. Negative points for the lame questions asked so far.
QUESTION: For mayoral candidates. Please describe your past business experience and whether you've been successful.
Mayor Smith: spells out a long resume, then rolls out the fact that the company she and her husband founded, Smith Temporaries/Cornerstone Staffing, will bring in $60 million in sales this year, via their 8 offices. I had no idea. $60 million is a pretty good number.
Jim Lang credits the Mayor with a very good answer. He says he's a lawyer, former Economic Development Town of Flower Mound, real estate developer.
SCORING UPDATE: Five points for the Mayor, or one point for every $12 million in sales. But she still trails Carol by 5. Refreshments trump sales. My blog, my scoring rules.
QUESTION: To all candidates, do we need additional taxes?
Mrs. Long. No. One-word answer, a big smile, and then applause.
Paul Stone gives a more thoughtful answer. He says he doesn't see a need now for more taxes, but acknowledges that voters will sometimes demand more services and more facilities, things that cost money. If the voters want these services and facilities (capital improvements), he'll respect their opinion and support those additional taxes. (added 5/8:
"as authorized by the voters")
Mayor Smith: No, but everything that we might consider needs to go before voters.
Mr. Lang: Says the key to keep taxes even is to attract more commercial development to Lakeside. Industrial part of this equation is building up just fine. The office part is slow, thanks to large vacancy rates throughout Dallas. Supports a quarter-cent sales tax to fund high-tech businesses. Voters would have to vote on it. Thinks it's a good idea.
SCORING: Five points for Lang and Stone for the most thoughtful answers.
QUESTION: Trails system. Yawn. Moving on. I love our trails, but seriously, is this a big issue in this campaign? No.
QUESTION: For Mr. Lang, while you were EconDev director, why did you never make a public appearance at council? Lang offers an inconsequential answer from an inconsequential question.
QUESTION: Ahh, now we get some meat. Some people want to change SmartGrowth and the Master Plan to allow more development in the Cross Timbers Conservation District. What do you think?
Mrs. Long says this is all being discussed in the public hearings -- waiting to hear feedback from those hearings. Will not support additional density though. Mr. Stone says the large landowners felt like they were being kept away from the discussion during previous Master Plan updates (with VU in charge, that's no surprise). The Mayor says that news media reports(?), the Council hasn't done anything to act on the Master Plan, other than to get the Steering Committee up and running. Mr. Lang says landowners out west are uncertain about property values, because a council vote can change requirements between 1-acre and 2-acre lots. We need to bring this for a vote of the citizens, and then stick with it.
QUESTION: Another gotcha try against Mr. Lang. Does his old company still operate, and did he operate it during his term on staff? Mr. Lang says it's a shell company only, and it doesn't currently do business. Check his books, if you like, he says.
***** TIME FOR A CONFESSION About one hour after this last paragraph, I wake myself up on the couch. Somehow I've fallen asleep. Seriously. It's late (11:30 or so). Meekly, I say "sorry" to all of you participating in the debate. But you gotta admit, this has been pretty dry so far.
***** RESUMING LOGGING THE NEXT MORNINGQUESTION: Why doesn't Flower Mound play nicer with its neighbors, like DCTA or Upper Trinity? Does this perception hurt economic development?
(A much better question -- thank YOU! -- this might have kept me awake had it played 10 minutes earlier in the program.)
Mr. Stone says we need to do better, but notes that DCTA twice went before Flower Mound voters, and we need to respect that. Also notes that we have an FM representative on the DCTA board, which is remarkable considering we don't pay tax money into DCTA.
Mrs. Smith says "we have gone where no other mayors or councils" have gone, in meeting with neighboring mayors and councils.
Mr. Lang seconds the mayor's comments, but then notes that the town filed its original petition against Upper Trinity three days after the Mayor took office two years ago. He says that the money we've spent fighting Upper Trinity coulda/shoulda been spent on economic development instead.
Mrs. Long says that Upper Trinity was basically dropped in the mayor's lap two years ago, based on staff recommendations, and that the energy behind that initial complaint was provided by the previous mayoral administration. She says that, even so, we're now doing the right thing. And she says this council is aggressively trying to change perception and outcome, by reaching out to neighboring citizens and going to meetings that people never used to go to, and that "we're being well received". (This is Mrs. Long's best answer of the night -- detailed information with gusto -- 5 points!)
QUESTION: If (re-)elected, will you vote for a sales tax rebate for any retail operation that comes to Flower Mound, as an incentive? Another good question, because the answers differ among the candidates. Pay attention, voters! Points of differentiation are hard to come by this year.
Mrs. Smith says she would attempt not to. We haven't before. Why start it now? But if it were something spectacular, and if there was no other way to get it done, and if the citizens were saying "yes", then perhaps.
Mr. Lang says it's a common and effective tool for generating economic growth that shouldn't be put aside just for political purposes. Says the JCPenney deal (recently announced) would have been helped along with a sales tax rebate, but then congratulates the council for getting JCPenney here without the incentive. (note to Mr. Lang: don't use examples that go against your argument). He does make a very good point in differentiating between commercial development and retail. Commercial development can locate anywhere, so sometimes there's a need for property tax rebates. Less so with retail development because they'll always go where they need to go to be near their customers.
Mrs. Long says we need to offer incentives for businesses to come here, but not to "give away the farm", if it's not necessary. Takes another blunted stab at Mr. Lang for saying that a tax rebate for JCPenney was never an option blessed by the council, and that the council had to work hard to overcome a perception that such an incentive was available for this project.
Mr. Stone says "never say never", but says retail will follow rooftops. Says a sales tax rebate is a good tool, but generally not needed in retail recruiting.
QUESTION: To Mr. Lang only, did you dangle sales tax rebate incentives before JCPenney? He says "yes", with blessing of the council. Given that this has been disputed between Mr. Lang and the council and mayor, it's odd that no one steps up to challenge him. We move on.
QUESTION: To Mr. Lang, you have made seven legal statements concerning Upper Trinity lawsuit that have been challenged as factually incorrect by town staff? Answer: Jim gives good information about the history of the two-year battle with UTWD, but he's merely rolling out a list of the facts. He's not making eye contact with the moderator (or more important, the audience). And despite his apparently deep understanding of the UTWD issues that bolster his beef that the whole Upper Trinity mess could have been prevented by the current administration, he's not winning any points because he's simply stating history and not trying to turn it into a persuasive argument.
BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE! The mayor says she has lots of facts to share with voters, presumably facts that will counter Lang's facts. Then she turns to Lang, looks him in the eye and says "I wish while you were a town employee, that knowledge would have been shared with us". Ouch! Uncomfortable moment, but I think it hurts the mayor more than Mr. Lang. Pretty petty, so far after the fact. Too bad the camera can't show us Mr. Lang's reaction.
QUESTION: What do you feel is the biggest issue the Town faces in the next 2 years?
Mr. Stone: Getting the master plan update. Getting roads done. Resolving Upper Trinity. Can't pick just one. He's kinda waffling here, but then delivers a solid answer. The biggest priority, he says, is for citizens to know they have a Town Council that listens to them, work for them and with them to accomplish the goals.
Mayor Smith: A continuation of the leadership we've had on the Council and the staff. Keep momentum, meet your needs, don't raise taxes. On the one hand, this answer may seem a little self-serving, but on the other, given where this Town was 2 years ago in the wake of the Voters United implosion, I can see where she's coming from.
Mr. Lang: Town staff continuity and turnover. 20% the past two years. 80 of a 400-person staff. That's too high.
Mrs. Long: Credits the new Town Manager. Says that some of the people (the 20%) who have left have not been replaced, so that means we've gotten more efficient.
QUESTION: For the Mayor, Mr. Lang was a candidate for Town Manager but he did not get the job? Why do you think the Council rejected his application? She says Mr. Lang's qualifications did not meet what was posted in the job description. Not challenged -- again we move on.
QUESTION: For everyone. Totally bizarre phrasing. "Will you protect the residents' quality of life, health, safety and welfare over that of a developer?" Duh! Everyone says "yes". Mr. Lang says he thinks this is where the Mayor is weak -- that she appeared to show favoritism to a landowner who wanted to put a Racetrack gas station on his property. He says the application failed, but that the mayor could have saved everyone time and money if she stepped in early to head it off.
QUESTION: For everyone, is there anything you heard said tonight that you'd like to respond to? The Mayor and Mr. Lang trade jabs on Racetrack, Lakeside development, and other who-said-what's. Way too "inside politics" for the average voter watching this debate. Mrs. Long inexplicably goes back to the campaign signs again - like really, who cares about the signs?
TIMECHECK: ABOUT 8:10
FINAL STATEMENTS:
Mr. Stone: Thanks again to the refreshments. Reminds voters that this level of government is the most responsive to the voters. Reminds voters to not believe all they read, but rather to ask candidates and elected leaders directly. Safe answer, best said by an unchallenged incumbent. Paul did a good job with his answers tonight, but he and Laurie were bit players in tonight's drama. I know Paul a little bit, I'm glad he's getting two more years.
Mrs. Long: Applauds Mr. Lang for sitting in the hot seat. Then tells voters to do their own digging, and they'll always make the right choice. Safe answer, best said by an unchallenged incumbent. Go get 'em, Laurie. Two more years for you too.
Mr. Lang: Says he's very proud of his work at Town's economic director. Says we need vision and leadership and accountability. He speaks well, but he's still speaking very quietly, and not looking at anyone in particular. He loses this last-chance opportunity to connect with the voters.
Mayor Smith: "I ask you today is Flower Mound not a better place to live today than two years ago? If your answer is yes, vote for Jody Smith." She goes on, but she's already hit the 3-2 pitch hard, if not for a home run, then at least for a stand-up double. She looks the audience straight in the eye, and speaks forcefully. It is her best moment of the night, and she saves it for her last.
FINAL ANALYSIS: If we're scoring on a points system, the refreshments still win out. So congratulations Carol. I don't have a trophy, but perhaps we could have a reception. Will you bring more refreshments?
In a campaign that could have been held entirely in the Town Library without drawing a single "hush" from the librarian, Jim Lang needed this hour to boldly state his case for change, and to persuade Flower Mound voters that he would make a better mayor than Jody Smith, who already has established name-recognition and credibility, and who already has one landslide victory under her belt. Mr. Lang has a terrific grasp of issues and key details -- perhaps a better technical grasp in some areas than the Mayor. But his lack of on-stage awareness, the lack of coaching in making presentations before voters, and the lack of a "smoking-gun" issue against the Mayor, hurt his chances of winning voters in this forum. I don't think he changed anyone's mind, and therefore the Mayor wins.
Ultimately, however, you decide who wins. Go vote!
Who do you think won the debate? Who had the best answers? Do you agree or disagree with what I wrote? Post a comment here to share your views.